Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '17 at 00:13
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 74.4 1-Core 107 2-Core 215 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 841 75% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,168 72% 1,168 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 116 Parallax 100 91% 109 fps	MRender 99.7 Gravity 102 Splatting 105 84% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 2,201 Write 1,140 Mixed 1,183 332% 1,508 MB/s	4K Read 49.5 4K Write 87.7 4K Mixed 43.7 178% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 106 113% 191 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 236%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 466GB free Firmware: AX001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1431 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4420 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 7235 (0A) Spinup retry count 188 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4384 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 168 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 48 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 104932 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 257698889764 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 89 89 4483 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 251 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	60.6% Good	Read 104 Write 108 Mixed 102 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.2 73% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$19 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 146GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 159 156 1050 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8414 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2815 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2518 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 79 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 181 181 59515 (C2) HDA temperature 107 96 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	37.6% Below average	Read 66.6 Write 64.2 Mixed 62 48% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.26 82% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 36%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB 822 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 12GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 124 Write 35 Mixed 49.1 72% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.79 105% 4.12 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-105.A00G 2x8GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 28.6 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 23.4 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 91.6 44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	329x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	195x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	125x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)