HP 600-1390

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 600-1390  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2A9A
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 02:26
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 142
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 241
28% 215 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M
HP(103C 197B) 2GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.2 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7
6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 96 97 84 107 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 153
Write 128
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 89.8
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AD8 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6AFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.4
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 3R 7G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 19% 62 38 16 60 32" 1920 1080 HWP4001 HP TouchSmart
Typical 600-1390 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 600-1390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback