Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4150T 1,418 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 128 65% 102 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 214 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 309E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	2.6% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 4.4 2% 3.03 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.9 3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.6% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB 3,453 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 230 284 280 306 310 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 432 Write 155 Mixed 255 SusWrite 276 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 26.3 92% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 25.8 DQ Mixed 1.3 5% 9.43 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB 38,580 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 7.7 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23"	1280 720	LEN10DF TinyinOne23

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-4150TIntelBench 58%, 1,418 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	2x

SSD
860 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 86%, 3,453 samples	1x
860 EVO 250G 250GBSamsunBench 109%, 81 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	1x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x