Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 19:46
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 77.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 271
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 762
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.9.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.7% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 116
Parallax 154
84% 124 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 112
Splatting 84.4
80% 100 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ400400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 391
Write 339
Mixed 280
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 9.7
36% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 12.9
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 30.1
19% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 55%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
507GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 88 92 91 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 138
Write 128
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 91.4
119% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 52%
FPEEDN ATA 2TB
2TB free, PID 3a04
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2.9 1.2 5.9 4.2 6.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 4
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.7
8% 7.73 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 33.9
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 30.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 3R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 31% 45 321 256 144 24" 1920 1080 AUS24AB VG248
Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $477
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback