| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HG4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130711 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 07 '21 at 16:05 |
| Run Duration | 235 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.3%
Above average
|
60% 101 Pts
|
30% 228 Pts
|
14% 231 Pts
|
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 2.9 50 42 26 MB/s
|
25.7%
Poor
|
36% 48.8 MB/s
|
155% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
394GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 102 109 109 89 48 MB/s
|
63.7%
Good
|
71% 96.9 MB/s
|
161% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.5 6.7 6.5 6.4 5.8 MB/s
|
9.77%
Terrible
|
13% 10.4 MB/s
|
90% 2.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Atermiter 0100 Atermiter9.A01LF 16GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.9%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
43% 93.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 42 | 6 | 4 | 64 | 0" | 1366 768 |
Typical H61M-HG4 Builds (Compare 191 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HG4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 35x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 18x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 15x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |