Lenovo 82C7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 82C7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 14:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 200
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 513
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11010C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 241 245 276 263 337 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,040
Write 914
Mixed 972
SusWrite 292
180% 805 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 61.8
209% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 668
499% 664 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 154%
Great: 176%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
300GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 280 288 286 276 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 496
Write 426
Mixed 401
SusWrite 302
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 21.3
115% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 25.8
71% 150 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FE Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 22.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 64 0" 1280 720
Typical 82C7 Builds (Compare 662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback