bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 14:16
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6126
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 197
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 671
62% 519 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-2B
Nvidia(10DE 117D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.9% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 57.6
49% 61.3 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 45
Splatting 45
37% 45 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,262
Write 2,320
Mixed 3,151
648% 2,911 MB/s
4K Read 83.5
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 81
277% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 748
614% 900 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 80%
Vmware Virtual disk 27GB
18GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 529
Write 363
Mixed 443
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 18.3
64% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 253
186% 242 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 35.7
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback