Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 34.4 31% 41.5 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 122 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 2.8 3% 2.93 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.8 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 240GB 581 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 178 70 104 111 28 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.9% Poor	Read 188 Write 76 Mixed 113 SusWrite 121 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 6.3 33% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 87.4 DQ Mixed 12.1 32% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 11.9 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 2 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	8x

SSD
LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GBLiteonitBench 78%, 3,907 samples	1x
SSD Pro 2500 Series 240GBIntel $225Bench 67%, 2,151 samples	1x
MZMPC256HBGJ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 57%, 517 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	1x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	1x
HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 3,567 samples	1x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $199