Asus G10AC

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus G10AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G10AC
Memory	9.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130625
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '21 at 10:17
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 217 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 582 58% 476 Pts	64-Core 580 36% 580 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Lighting 74 Reflection 77.2 Parallax 71 60% 74.1 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 74 Splatting 71 58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 154 145 137 118 152 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 453 Write 117 Mixed 146 SusWrite 141 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 30.2 124% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 130 125% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 129%
Crucial_ Crucial_CT750MX3 750GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 39GB free Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 268 260 267 260 265 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 386 Write 418 Mixed 373 SusWrite 252 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 89.7 4K Mixed 33.9 126% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 334 253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 24GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 20.2 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	212x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	94x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	37x
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	22x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 370 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16