Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 04:50
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 118
51% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 199
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
PNY(196E 097A) 2GB
CLim: 1274 MHz, MLim: 1558 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 42.5
26% 36.7 fps
MRender 46.6
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 33.3
32% 40.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 2.8 2.9 113 126 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 418
Write 304
Mixed 293
SusWrite 87.8
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 17.5
62% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 80.9
DQ Mixed 43.5
47% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 13.8
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback