Lenovo 20F9003CUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20F9003CUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20F9003CUS
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171219
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 17:25
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 169
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 244
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7812
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 6.4
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 256GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT25L6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 330
Write 300
Mixed 152
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 44
143% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 328
256% 352 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 14" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Typical 20F9003CUS Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20F9003CUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback