Lenovo 254127G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 254127G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 254127G
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 17:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 109
54% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 202
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 2800M
Legend(17AA 214F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 2.6
6% 6.73 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 3.6
4% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 198 198 199 203 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.5% Average
Read 219
Write 202
Mixed 203
SusWrite 200
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 18.7
56% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 117
97% 141 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-G7 029E CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 12GB
1334, 1066, 1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 254127G Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 254127G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback