MSI Z97A GAMING 7 (MS-7916)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7916
MotherboardMSI Z97A GAMING 7 (MS-7916)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 10:27
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 662
72% 572 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 86.2
58% 75.8 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 58.9
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,488
Write 1,049
Mixed 1,238
349% 1,592 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 45.9
218% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 93.6
112% 191 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 239%
Great: 236%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
85GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.U Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 497
Mixed 501
112% 503 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 13.7
110% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 14.2
74% 164 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 163
Mixed 154
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.29
78% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
850GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 104
Write 125
Mixed 122
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.41
124% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 76%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
280GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 141
Write 115
Mixed 109
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.86
4K Mixed 0.63
164% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 80%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
354GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 88.1
Write 90.1
Mixed 86
66% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.22
76% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
119GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 164
Write 142
Mixed 130
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.3
93% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97A GAMING 7 (MS-7916) Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97A GAMING 7 (MS-7916)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback