MSI MS-1762

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT70
MotherboardMSI MS-1762  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 12:27
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 152
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 368
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
MSI(1462 10BC) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 10.1 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MRMAD4B128GC9M2C00 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MRV1.5.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 138 132 135 138 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 408
Write 162
Mixed 214
SusWrite 138
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 28.6
106% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 169
130% 176 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 62%
MRMAD4B128GC9M2C00 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: MRV1.5.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 146 145 149 149 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 399
Write 166
Mixed 215
SusWrite 141
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 31.7
113% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 179
134% 180 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 62%
MD05000-NVDW-RO 500GB
412GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 69 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 87.3
Write 87.1
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 77
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 6.3 15 9.1 9.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 93.1
Write 16.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 12.3
29% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.4
114% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2S4G64CB8HG5N-DI 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17.3" 1920 1080 CMO1720
Typical MS-1762 Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1762

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback