Alldocube i1305

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlldocube i1305  (all builds)
MotherboardALLDOCUBE ALLDOCUBE
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3000 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 00:14
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 36.5
1-Core 58
2-Core 116
38% 70.3 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 114
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(F000 02F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hoodisk SSD 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 303 318 294 280 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 251
Write 68
Mixed 204
SusWrite 300
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 13.7
94% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 179
142% 199 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 7% 15 30 22 60 13.5" 1200 800 MEI96A2 VVX14P048M00
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B
Typical i1305 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alldocube i1305

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback