Packard EasyNote TJ66

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TJ66  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50MV
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 32
2-Core 62.7
35% 52 Pts
4-Core 30.7
8-Core 32.4
4% 31.6 Pts
64-Core 32.5
2% 32.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0219) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1892
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.6
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 94 25 59 26 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 145
Write 196
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 62.7
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 14.5
60% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 27.2
DQ Mixed 55.7
48% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TJ66 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TJ66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback