Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 19:28
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 129
57% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 388
38% 311 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1385) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.2% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 40.6
36% 43.2 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 35.6
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 393
Write 83.2
Mixed 117
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 18.2
67% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 87.2
76% 115 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Ocz-vert EX PLUS R2 247GB
97GB free
Firmware: 1.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 188
Write 192
Mixed 82.9
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 10
45% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 63.2
DQ Write 20.8
DQ Mixed 12.1
17% 32 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
1TB free
Firmware: X41320RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 742
Write 674
Mixed 384
133% 600 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 29.4
92% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 169
131% 179 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 107%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
723GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 748
Write 413
Mixed 425
116% 529 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 31.4
112% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 175
127% 165 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
530GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 446
Write 144
Mixed 380
71% 323 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 30.2
97% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 187
133% 172 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
SanDisk SD5SB2128G1010E 128GB
119GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 313
Write 293
Mixed 165
314% 257 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 11
1,032% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.2
DQ Write 28.5
DQ Mixed 11.7
1,416% 17.8 MB/s
Seagate Desktop 8TB
7TB free, PID 3343
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,315
Write 22.7
Mixed 45.2
544% 794 MB/s
4K Read 205
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.3
929% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 72%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
473GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 128 130 131 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 118
Write 127
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 130
158% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 70%
Samsung SSD 840 Series 250GB
121GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 159 151 153 150 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 315
Write 249
Mixed 147
SusWrite 156
274% 217 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 10.2
1,089% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 28
DQ Mixed 12.6
1,444% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 146%
Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.8% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 19.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 14
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 75 27" 1280 720 IVM6665 PL2740QS
Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback