Acer Aspire G7700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire G7700  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer MC72XE
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080617
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 15:55
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 71.1
34% 52.9 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 119
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 0432) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 46.6
28% 40.1 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 26.9
25% 31 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
474GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 10 11 12 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 38
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 22
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.3
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 HWP331B HP 22er
Typical Aspire G7700 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire G7700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback