Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515JP
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210603
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '21 at 10:51
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	SYC-User
Background CPU	6%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 129 2-Core 249 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 451 59% 443 Pts	64-Core 332 20% 332 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX330 4,518 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 1F0F) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 18.6 Parallax 18.8 16% 19.1 fps	MRender 18.5 Gravity 20.2 Splatting 16.7 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 846 892 907 918 928 794 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,399 Write 904 Mixed 838 SusWrite 881 225% 1,006 MB/s	4K Read 58.2 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 71.1 259% 93.1 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 833 DQ Mixed 342 329% 502 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB 1,143 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.5% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 22.7 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 22.6 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	86x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	82x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	4x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	60x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	60x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	52x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	36x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	31x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	14x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 71%, 1,143 samples	33x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	25x
M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,191 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16