Fujitsu FMVNA5NEZ2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu FMVNA5NEZ2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB22B
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 06:44
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 161
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 350
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15E9) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X232201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 253 266 245 254 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 387
Write 278
Mixed 204
SusWrite 253
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 17.3
61% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 106
115% 197 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 89%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
422GB free
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 82
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 101
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 02FE EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 FUJ5C12
Typical FMVNA5NEZ2 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVNA5NEZ2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $61
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback