Microtest H81N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Microtest H81N (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte H81N
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150810
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '21 at 06:19
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 94.7 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 216 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 584 62% 494 Pts	64-Core 596 37% 596 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.5% Above average	Lighting 69.7 Reflection 73 Parallax 67.6 57% 70.1 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 71 Splatting 66.9 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 23 24 23 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB 12,882 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1TB free Firmware: 030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 23 24 24 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 99%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 500GB 1,723 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 440GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 36 37 37 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 40.2 Write 40.7 Mixed 32.4 SusWrite 37.8 28% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.2 260% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18.5 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 19 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	107	6	60	52"	1920 1080	GSM0000 LG TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81N Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Microtest H81N

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	4x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	4x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	3x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	3x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	3x

RAM
CM3B8G2C1600L9L 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GBUnknownBench 52%, 7 samples	4x
HP698650-154-KEB 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 714 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16