Paradigit MS-7586

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Paradigit MS-7586 (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI P55-CD53 (MS-7586)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100427
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '21 at 05:30
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 93.9 1-Core 88 2-Core 160 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 369 42% 326 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 1665) 2GB CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.3 Reflection 22.2 Parallax 15.4 13% 18 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 18 Splatting 16.4 16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple TS256C 251GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJAA0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 73 101 111 128 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 118 Write 108 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 104 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 18.3 47% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14.8 DQ Write 57.8 DQ Mixed 20.1 20% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 50%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 543GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 81 78 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 140 Write 118 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 79.5 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 77%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 813GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 13 11 11 41 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 90.8 Write 60.1 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 18.3 32% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 54% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 77%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 289GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 62 61 62 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 63.6 Write 61.7 Mixed 40.8 SusWrite 60.8 42% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 742GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 124 121 114 122 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 73.8 Write 122 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 120 67% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 108 111 112 109 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 105 Write 104 Mixed 57.6 SusWrite 111 69% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 69%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 426GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 76 81 84 84 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 80.3 Write 81.2 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 81.7 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 14GB 9,406 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	39.5% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 12 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 12.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	23.8"	1280 720	AOC2401 24B1W1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7586 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Paradigit MS-7586

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	1x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	1x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K2000DNvidiaBench 8%, 1,102 samples	1x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	1x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $104Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	1x
TS256C 251GBAppleBench 39%, 638 samples	1x
KingFast 240GBBench 58%, 4,155 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	2x
14GBUnknownBench 35%, 9,406 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $204

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16