| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Foxconn Q77M (all builds) |
| Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140213 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 05 '21 at 00:18 |
| Run Duration | 227 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.3%
Good
|
71% 124 Pts
|
47% 353 Pts
|
20% 332 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
|
46.5%
Average
|
50% 56.8 fps
|
39% 48 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 47 50 46 44 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
16% 70.2 MB/s
|
75% 25.7 MB/s
|
46% 62.8 MB/s
|
|
SSD 256GB 256GB
172GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 30 30 28 28 MB/s
|
||||
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
242GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 100 101 103 102 MB/s
|
49.3%
Average
|
53% 71.8 MB/s
|
122% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown SF564128CJ8N 0194 SF564128CJ8N 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
49.3%
Average
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
47% 85 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 53: 10R 1G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53% | 30% | 37 | 283 | 208 | 60 | 23.1" | 1920 1080 | GSM56F0 W2353 |
History: Score 40: 6R 2G 4B | Score 53: 10R 1G 0B
Typical Q77M Builds (Compare 14 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn Q77M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 6x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 2x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 2x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $325 |