Oegstone Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemOegstone Q87M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '21 at 22:06
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 194
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 558
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1312 MHz, MLim: 1770 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.9.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.8% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 81.9
50% 66.6 fps
MRender 57.6
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 43.5
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 15 44 21 41 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 164
Write 87
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 45.8
22% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 20.1
64% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 95.2
84% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
7GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 66 67 66 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 66.2
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 66.9
43% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
298GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 111 113 112 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 112
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 99U5403-162.A00LF 99U5403-159.A01LF 0702 1GX64V160K SAM 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 1R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 15% 85 147 52 60 24" 1920 1080 ACI24A5 VG248
History: Score 7: 0R 2G 1B | Score 27: 1R 5G 7B
Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback