HP 550-195nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-195nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '21 at 19:10
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 374
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 10.3
10% 12.4 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 13.5
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 383
Mixed 359
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 40.5
138% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 237
192% 270 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
116GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 93 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 160
Write 107
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 94.5
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 IVM664F PL2792H
Typical 550-195nf Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 550-195nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback