Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A12-8830B R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 230 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 57.6 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 84.7 39% 62.6 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 144 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 6,884 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5121) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.12.06 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.87% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 4 0% 2.53 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 3 Splatting 3 2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.87% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W128G1001 128GB 504 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 116 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 371 Write 148 Mixed 230 SusWrite 114 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 27.7 81% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 206 158% 215 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.2% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 7 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	12.5"	1280 720	LEN40E0

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
PRO A12-8830B R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 38%, 230 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	3x

SSD
SD9SB8W128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 72%, 504 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	2x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16