Asrock X300M-STX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X300M-STX  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210701
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '21 at 14:36
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 239
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 637
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.9.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 32.3
19% 24.3 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 16
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 1TB
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 674 65 640 925 928 485 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 1,565
Mixed 1,074
SusWrite 620
265% 1,180 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 35.9
181% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 804
DQ Write 702
DQ Mixed 579
482% 695 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 183%
Great: 259%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB
912GB free
Firmware: JT001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 106 106 110 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 130
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 108
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
234% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 80%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 125GB
49GB free, PID 140a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.6 14 13 14 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
9.67% Terrible
Read 36.5
Write 31.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 12.4
24% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.67%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 30.6
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 26.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 5R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 8% 106 181 142 60 27" 1920 1080 PHLC18E PHL 271E9
Typical X300M-STX Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock X300M-STX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $168
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback