Notebook NJ5x_NJ7xLU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemNotebook NJ5x_NJ7xLU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NJ5x_NJ7xLU
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateOct 04 '21 at 11:47
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 467
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Clevo(1558 8680) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 7.2
6% 6.03 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 10
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8312c20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 276 325 282 317 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 371
Write 277
Mixed 297
SusWrite 298
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 29.3
101% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 167
128% 171 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16S4B.8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP002D
Typical NJ5x_NJ7xLU Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook NJ5x_NJ7xLU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback