Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite T235D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA NDU11
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110310
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '21 at 02:17
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II Neo K325 Dual-Core 193 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 26.6 21% 29.4 Pts	4-Core 30.1 8-Core 37.4 4% 33.8 Pts	64-Core 37.9 2% 37.9 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 11,054 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDA0) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.32% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 1.1 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 0.6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.32% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 105 87 97 117 86 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.5% Below average	Read 199 Write 166 Mixed 149 SusWrite 98 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 19.5 59% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 99.4 DQ Write 76.9 DQ Mixed 79.3 62% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II Neo K325 Dual-CoreAMDBench 30%, 193 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
CT102464BF160B.C16 16GBMicronBench 14%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $85