Lenovo 43517W7

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 43517W7 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140109
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '21 at 19:03
Run Duration	321 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 187 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 512 51% 415 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% EVGA(3842 1580) 1.5GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Lighting 26.3 Reflection 60.6 Parallax 30.9 21% 39.3 fps	MRender 43.4 Gravity 22.2 Splatting 29.5 26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 129 96 91 85 87 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 490 Write 448 Mixed 358 SusWrite 142 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 30.9 115% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 180 151% 220 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 392GB free Firmware: JP4ONS01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 123 123 125 124 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 86.8 Write 89 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 124 63% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 8GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 5.6 5.8 5.3 3.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 17.2 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 9.3 23% 19 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.9 184% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965447-056.A Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 12GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.8% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8.8 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 5R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	24%	49	256	192	60	21.5"	1920 1080	HWP2947 HP LA2206

History: Score 20: 1R 3G 6B | Score 47: 5R 5G 7B | Score 31: 3R 3G 7B | Score 36: 5R 2G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 43517W7 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 43517W7

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GTX 580Nvidia $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $64Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 218 samples	3x
9965447-056.A Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 12GBKingstonBench 29%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $521

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16