Intel DP55SB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemINTEL_ KBIBX10J
MotherboardIntel DP55SB  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110630
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 14:39
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 165
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 405
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$24
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 152 53 132 185 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 151
Write 143
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 139
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 500GB
191GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 21 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 16.7
Mixed 18
SusWrite 22
28% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x48503635353430392D3135302D4859434720 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DP55SB Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DP55SB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $492Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback