Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X705QA
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191031
Uptime	31.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '21 at 14:37
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 48.5 2-Core 95.4 42% 68.1 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 160 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 1911) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.94% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 5 0% 2.87 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3 3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.94% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB 2,914 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 112 112 94 92 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 414 Write 148 Mixed 248 SusWrite 108 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 32 104% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 178 137% 187 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 93%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 135 137 138 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 138 Write 141 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 137 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.6 241% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB 48,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.5% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 7.8 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 7 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 17: 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	22%	23	36	21	60	17.2"	1600 900	CMN1745

History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 17: 2R 2G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA

CPU
A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 17,422 samples	6x
A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 6,180 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	6x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	3x

SSD
SD9SN8W128G1102 128GBSandiskBench 67%, 2,914 samples	3x
RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 58%, 2,813 samples	2x
840 250GBSamsung $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	2x
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 31%, 5,641 samples	2x
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 16,227 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16