Lenovo 90N900CTFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90N900CTFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 370A
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 10:44
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 256
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 836
82% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
MSI(1462 3852) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.4% Above average
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 76
Parallax 73.5
63% 75.7 fps
MRender 60.5
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 59.1
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HALU-000L1 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1263 896 342 355 352 342 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 872
Write 859
Mixed 797
SusWrite 592
176% 780 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 73.1
250% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 735
DQ Mixed 870
638% 838 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 185%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-3G2J1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.1% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 23.1
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90N900CTFR Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 90N900CTFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback