Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 07:08
Run Duration484 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
92% 176 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 908
90% 736 Pts
64-Core 1463
90% 1463 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 85.2
Parallax 75.6
60% 78.3 fps
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 66.3
61% 69.8 fps
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1745 1808 1389 1110 1113 1114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,185
Write 1,637
Mixed 796
SusWrite 1380
334% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 68.2
250% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,183
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 929
738% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 297%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
465GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 452 449 449 449 448 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 443
Mixed 396
SusWrite 450
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 57.9
189% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: HPS0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1810 1050 805 804 807 805 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,603
Write 1,704
Mixed 1,699
SusWrite 1,014
391% 1,755 MB/s
4K Read 70.5
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 93.8
315% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,334
DQ Write 1,091
DQ Mixed 1,175
890% 1,200 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 318%
Great: 296%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
275GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 124 123 122 124 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 112
Write 75.2
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 122
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
392GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 125 124 126 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 91.1
Mixed 77
SusWrite 125
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
218GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 96 97 97 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 59.9
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 98
62% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
218GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 128 128 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 147
Write 88.1
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 128
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
131GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 60 59 60 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 99.1
Write 106
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 59.7
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 59%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
325GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 123 123 123 124 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 99.6
Write 54.5
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 122
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
392GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 88 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 130
Write 77.3
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 87.6
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB
452GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 113 115 114 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
Read 118
Write 123
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 113
145% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
362GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 65 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 57.6
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 64.9
80% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 42%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 126 126 126 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 190
Write 132
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 124
174% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 68%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 112 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 106
SusWrite 114
159% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60M2NA0 1TB
929GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 125 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 185
Write 182
Mixed 141
SusWrite 124
210% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
138% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 76%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60M2NA0 1TB
446GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 143 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 176
Write 171
Mixed 136
SusWrite 143
210% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
145% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 76%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
548GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 143 143 143 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
174% Outstanding
Read 392
Write 391
Mixed 358
SusWrite 143
424% 321 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 24.6
1,813% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 32.9
DQ Mixed 27.4
2,146% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 174%
Great: 231%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.1
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 26.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 HWP3013 HP L2206tm
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback