EVGA 132-YW-E179-FTW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardEVGA 132-YW-E179-FTW  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 05:08
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 85.7
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 81.2
47% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 163
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 275-$250
EVGA(3842 1171) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 6.4
10% 11 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 11
Splatting 3.9
6% 8.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct480bx5 0 480GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 193 193 192 197 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 227
Write 181
Mixed 199
SusWrite 192
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 17.4
81% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 21.4
27% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-YW-E179-FTW Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 132-YW-E179-FTW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $44
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback