Lenovo 20240

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20240  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 17:06
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 13.7
2-Core 21.7
8% 17.7 Pts
4-Core 24.7
8-Core 26.1
3% 25.4 Pts
64-Core 13.1
1% 13.1 Pts
Poor: 8% Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8280
Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 0.9
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BC10009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 61 99 115 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 111
Write 128
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 97.3
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6EFR8A-PB CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.71% Terrible
MC Read 0.8
MC Write 1.3
MC Mixed 1.7
4% 1.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 0.7
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 750
5% 750 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 7 11 2 60 15.5" 1366 768 LGD033A
Typical 20240 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback