Panasonic CF-53AAGZX1M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Panasonic CF-53AAGZX1M (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CF53-1
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16.0078 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110712
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '21 at 06:59
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Memory 79.8 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 104 57% 88.3 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 158 18% 144 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(10F7 8338) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 441 388 331 343 354 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 387 Write 341 Mixed 323 SusWrite 380 81% 358 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 24.5 86% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 321 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 325 242% 321 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 56GB 1,895 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 1600, 1600, 0 MHz 8192, 8192, 40960 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.4% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 13.5 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 80.9 50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	58	14"	1280 720	MS_9003 1366x768

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CF-53AAGZX1M Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-53AAGZX1M

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	5x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	5x

SSD
PM830 256GBSamsungBench 66%, 2,468 samples	1x
SSD 1TBBench 80%, 9,059 samples	1x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x

RAM
56GBUnknownBench 98%, 1,895 samples	4x
48GBUnknownBench 49%, 2,786 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $34

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359