Foxconn H61MD/H61MD-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H61MD/H61MD-V  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 21:09
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 383
52% 385 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(1B4C 116F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 40.9
36% 44 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 36.4
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 43 115 75 84 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24% Poor
Read 155
Write 86.8
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 84.3
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 9.6
39% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609D 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 1R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 58% 12 313 241 60 18.5" 1366 768 GSM4C24 19M35
History: Score 14: 1R 2G 3B | Score 16: 2R 0G 6B | Score 17: 1R 3G 3B
Typical H61MD/H61MD-V Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MD/H61MD-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback