Samsung 850XBD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung 850XBD  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP850XBD-XG2BR
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 16:01
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 680
71% 571 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Sanyo(144D C186) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 50.3
45% 55.8 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 48.3
38% 46.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CV8-8E256 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C282002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 236 238 248 205 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 457
Write 349
Mixed 117
SusWrite 225
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 22
83% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 67.7
DQ Mixed 100
93% 150 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
914GB free
Firmware: JU003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 132 133 133 133 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 142
Write 115
Mixed 60
SusWrite 132
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
150% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
3GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 4.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 4.3
10% 9.02 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 23.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0064
Typical 850XBD Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 850XBD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback