HP p6768sc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP p6768sc  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 13:28
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 85
2-Core 153
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 204
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 54.5
34% 45.4 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 41.4
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 68 62 62 81 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 48.8
Write 61.4
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 67.8
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CB04 D63I1B16 CE80CE80 M378B5773DH0-CH9 HY63I1B16 CE80CE80 M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 110 6 75 18.9" 1440 900 GSM4B6A L194W
Typical p6768sc Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p6768sc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback