Toshiba Satellite L745

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite L745  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110517
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 10:34
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 89.4
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 109
55% 84.7 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 137
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FCD0) 771MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2843
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 64 86 79 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 84.3
Write 89
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 75.7
53% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 61%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB
357GB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 20.5
Mixed 24
SusWrite 19
31% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 51%
Seagate BUP Slim GD 1TB
683GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 20
Mixed 15
SusWrite 18.9
26% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L745 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L745

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback