Medion S15447

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMedion S15447  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION M15C
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 10:10
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 205
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 560
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A006) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 8.7
5% 7.93 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 13.7
9% 11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27 512GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 353 370 316 345 318 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65% Good
Read 318
Write 96.3
Mixed 281
SusWrite 345
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 11.7
62% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 203
178% 262 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 23.9
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 24.1
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 10% 10 66 52 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0700
History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 26: 3R 2G 5B | Score 16: 1R 2G 5B | Score 26: 2R 4G 4B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B
Typical S15447 Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion S15447

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback