Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Dell Precision T1600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1600 (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180705
Uptime	13.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '21 at 22:52
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 90 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 390 41% 328 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36FA) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 4.1 3% 3.9 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 340 337 341 324 307 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 451 Write 348 Mixed 277 SusWrite 328 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 53 4K Mixed 30.2 103% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 135 154% 264 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,405 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 716GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 15 16 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	22% Poor	Read 27.5 Write 23 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 15.4 28% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 53%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 2,476 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	8.31% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 11.7 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 10.8 18% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 57% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.31% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 27GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.2 5.8 5.4 5.5 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	6.18% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 11.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6 13% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1 56% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GB 1,553 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.7% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 13.7 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
1%	3%	39	12	7	60	21.5"	1920 1080	SAM0B3F S22D300

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

CPU
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples	195x
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples	160x
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples	96x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	51x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16