Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 22:31
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 144
59% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 427
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
MSI(1462 293A) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 31
17% 26.3 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 24
19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 270 287 291 290 285 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 394
Mixed 368
SusWrite 298
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 48.2
148% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 260
195% 261 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
171GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 365 399 290 306 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 408
Mixed 404
SusWrite 348
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 44.4
158% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 172
151% 226 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 17.7
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 40" 1280 720 SAM0C39 SAMSUNG
Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $82

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback