MSI Z97-G55 SLI (MS-7921)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7921
MotherboardMSI Z97-G55 SLI (MS-7921)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160219
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 14:22
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3-$245
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 562
54% 444 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Sapphire(174B 1376) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.97
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 38.1
32% 40.2 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 32
29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 240GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0818A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 207 110 108 109 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 416
Write 366
Mixed 299
SusWrite 144
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 17
107% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 33.4
64% 125 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 99%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
361GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 87 88 88 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 136
Write 15.7
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 86.7
61% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.2
151% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 79%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 129 129 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 126
155% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG Samsung M391B5273CH0-CH9 Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M391B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 23" 1280 720 HWP3032 HP 23xi
Typical Z97-G55 SLI (MS-7921) Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97-G55 SLI (MS-7921)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback