Turbo-x E1100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTurbo-x E1100  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B450M_DS3H
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 10:22
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 64
2-Core 122
51% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 191
27% 197 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 12.2
7% 9.33 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 8.1
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 154 231 207 88 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45% Average
Read 327
Write 180
Mixed 222
SusWrite 161
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 15.5
61% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 20.9
DQ Mixed 34.3
36% 63.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
930GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 168 190 185 97 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 185
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 153
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 2.5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 66 38 23 60 21.5" 1920 1080 AOC2201 22E1W
Typical E1100 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Turbo-x E1100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback