HP 700-155ef

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 700-155ef  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 09:01
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 183
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 581
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 128
Parallax 119
101% 123 fps
MRender 92.6
Gravity 120
Splatting 109
88% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 411 419 445 465 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 449
Mixed 409
SusWrite 394
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 47.7
155% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 353
264% 351 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 5R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 26% 35 330 250 165 27" 1920 1080 MSI3CA9 MSI G27C4
Typical 700-155ef Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: HP 700-155ef

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback