Supermicro NONE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 244%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro NONE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X12SPA-TF
Memory121.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 07:35
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
CPU, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 131
2-Core 260
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 966
83% 711 Pts
64-Core 3,365
208% 3,365 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
211% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 292
Parallax 346
255% 317 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 254
Splatting 188
206% 262 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 211%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv1t02 TOSHIBA 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGGA4104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1978 1630 1624 1634 1639 1633 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,073
Write 2,323
Mixed 1619
SusWrite 1,690
434% 1,926 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 80.2
273% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,118
DQ Write 1,046
DQ Mixed 1,045
795% 1,070 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 319%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7DJR4N-XN 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
181% Outstanding
MC Read 83.9
MC Write 75
MC Mixed 64.2
212% 74.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 14.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 181%
Great: 213%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 100 48.8" 1280 720 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical NONE Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 217%
UFO

System: Supermicro NONE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback