Panasonic CF-SX2A18CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.02GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPanasonic CF-SX2A18CS  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFSX2-3
Memory0.4 GB free of 4.01563 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121227
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 07:33
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 71.3
40% 58.8 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 222
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSPA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 131 123 122 128 111 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 194
Write 97.1
Mixed 119
SusWrite 121
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 8.4
32% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 93.5
DQ Mixed 109
84% 116 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 52GB
1333, 0 MHz
4096, 49152 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.3% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 2R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 8% 36 18 12 60 12.1" 1600 900 MS_9003 BM111_HDP_60
History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 11: 2R 0G 1B
Typical CF-SX2A18CS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-SX2A18CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback