Lenovo 82C4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 82C4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 17:20
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 251
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 465
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX330
Legend(17AA 3F8B) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5749
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 18.9
16% 20.4 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 19
Splatting 16.3
14% 18 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HBHQ-000L2 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 113 113 111 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 864
Write 161
Mixed 170
SusWrite 114
70% 327 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 39.2
163% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 187
143% 197 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 169%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
925GB free
Firmware: JU0A0E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 138 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 142
Write 140
Mixed 60
SusWrite 137
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.6
239% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 19.4
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 21.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 1% 127 244 134 60 14" 1280 720 BOE07D3
History: Score 7: 1R 0G 2B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 3: 0R 1G 0B
Typical 82C4 Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback